Welcome to MacTalk Australia

the largest Australian community for Apple discussions and topics

╗ Join the discussions, Register Now!
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    1,869

    Default

    I have noticed you guys raving about the speed of 10.3 on older machines? is this really true or is it like putting windoze eggs pee on a pentium 500?

    the reason i ask is my g/f's g4 533 is a bit pokey running 10.2.8 so if i can get panther on there would it make that much difference? its got 256mb ram and a really noisy 80gb drive CDRW etc.
    Know me before you judge me...

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    6,201

    Default

    If it can run 10.2.8 - then it will run 10.3.3 better. It is more streamlined, basic folder browsing is twice as fast (my opinion).

    One thing though - make sure you have enough ram. I've seen panther run on 128MB ram, but ideally - you'd want at least 512MB.
    Read my drivel, be dazzled by my Twitter

    Are you some kind of devil trying to keep me from using my time usefully? - Currawong
    "You're an enigma wrapped in a ferreo roche" - fulltimecasual

  3. #3

    Default

    I noticed a reasonable difference and kicked myself for not buying 10.3 sooner.

    Plus ExposÚ is the coolest! Specially for developers
    Regards, Anthony
    Infinite Networks - Proud Sponsor of MacTalk Australia
    Broadband // Hosting // Domains // Web Design & Development
    Unit 4 / 42 Geils Court,
    Deakin West ACT 2600
    Ph: 1300 790 337

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    9,050

    Default

    I'd say 10.3.3 is very noticably faster. Just installed it on an iMac 266 and was surprised at how responsive it is. Apple are continually optimising the system, so, as always, even point updates will be faster generally.
    The discussion has continued at AppleTalk Australia.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Condobolin, NSW
    Posts
    177

    Default

    I've put it on my old B&W G3 (though I've cheated and put a G4/500 daughterboard in the old girl) and it is noticeably faster than 10.2.x.

    Well worth the upgrade, IMHO. B)
    Laugh and the world laughs with you. Cry and they think you're a bl**dy idiot!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Atlantic Canada
    Posts
    533

    Default

    Originally posted by Jimbo@May 21 2004, 02:45 PM
    I have noticed you guys raving about the speed of 10.3 on older machines? is this really true or is it like putting windoze eggs pee on a pentium 500?

    the reason i ask is my g/f's g4 533 is a bit pokey running 10.2.8 so if i can get panther on there would it make that much difference? its got 256mb ram and a really noisy 80gb drive CDRW etc.
    hehe sometimes cliches are so, because they're true!! yes it's faster - in the realworld sense of faster.

    i'd be like putting Windows 95 on a Pentium 500 - noticably "zippy"!!
    I'd rather be posting from an Apple //c

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    165

    Default

    what they said....
    \

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Geelong/Vic/Au
    Posts
    134

    Default

    The speed of my 350Mhz iMac increased exponentially when I installed 10.3. The difference is massive. With 10.2.8, it litterally took around 5 minutes to turn on cfrom cold, and was very, very choppy. With 10.3, it takes about 30 seconds to load up, and is alot more zippy in all aspects. It really does have a massive effect, that I hope continues with 10.4

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Condobolin, NSW
    Posts
    177

    Default

    Originally posted by Radar@May 21 2004, 06:34 PM
    [...] It really does have a massive effect, that I hope continues with 10.4
    Amen!
    Laugh and the world laughs with you. Cry and they think you're a bl**dy idiot!

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sellicks Beach, SA
    Posts
    3,537

    Default

    I just have to add a comment although it has been pretty much all said already. 10.3.x is an absolute treat to use. Smooth, fast and stable.

    Originally I thought so little of 10.2.6 that I used 9.2.2 in preference to it for just about everything. I couldn't even be bothered updating to 10.2.8 because it just plain did not seem worth it. 2 hours with 10.3 and 6 months later I haven't looked back. I REALLY love it.

    NOTE: personal opinion follows based exclusively on MY experience. YMMV

    On machines: imacs G3 350 (now someone elses) and DV400: 128 MB you can install it but you will be surprised by constant HD activity, 192 MB you can run safari and mail simultaneously but the HD will still run quite alot (explanation: VM at work. look at the activity monitor to see the number of page ins and outs and this will make more sense-'page'=4096 bytes) and it will run out of headroom quickly and performance can be surprisingly bad. 384 MB and it starts to get efficient and performance becomes consistently fast and the HD noticeably less active. The memory manager is now able to cache alot of data in RAM and performance reflects this. (access to cached data in RAM is measured in nanoseconds rather than milliseconds from the HD) 512 MB and above? Beautiful.
    I haven't tried testing different RAM configurations on the new G4 but i expect the results would be similar.

    Sorry, where was I?

    Yep, it makes that much difference. Would have to be one of the most worthwhile software purchases I have ever made

    cheers, kim

    1/6/04 EDIT: (for those with low RAM configurations. when I say 'runs out of headroom' were talking 5+ open windows each with about 8 active tabs. I could hear you all thinking 'but mine works fine'. It was not meant to sound critical, in fact I am and was impressed by it)

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    393

    Default

    My experiences mirror those above. My little iMac happily chugs away at 333MHz with 128MB RAM. It's lived through all of the MacOSX incarnations, and with each release they get faster and faster. 10.3 is definitely the preferred partner for this little guy, and performs very well despite it's age.

    I'd love to stick more RAM in it, but that's unlikely at this stage. A faster hard drive would probably improve VM thrash times. The default iMac hard disks were all 3400RPM, so a newer 7200RPM drive with 8MB cache would help enormously, and not really cost the earth (compared to tracking down compatible 128MB PC133 SODIMM-SDRAM modules that worked with the iMac).
    "Saying your operating system is the best because more people use it is like saying MacDonalds make the best food"

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •