Welcome to MacTalk Australia

the largest Australian community for Apple discussions and topics

Join the discussions, Register Now!
Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1

    Default

    Can anyone direct me to info on why I should stay with QuarkXpress and not move studio software over to the more affordable Adobe Indesign?

  2. #2

    Default

    its all really personal preference...

    i still like quark h34r:

    their is a few bits about some one of the graphic design forums... will send you a few links when i get home, i have a few bookmarked

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    467

    Default

    I spoke to a solutions reseller in Perth about this recently. They run training courses for both packages. I can't remember the numbers exactly, but it went something like this: "We run InDesign workshops every 2 weeks but only get enough interest to run QuarkXpress workshops every 2-3 months."


  4. #4
    hoony's Avatar hoony is offline I reject your reality and substitute my own.

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    321

    Default

    Here's my two cents....

    I'm a Quark user from way back (fave being 4.11) and was initally horrified when our studio went over to InDesign CS about a year ago. Now that I've used InDesign I think Quark 6 in OSX is cumbersome, buggy and a real battle. InDesign just works, the layout is logical and it integrates with Photoshop/Illustrator/Acrobat very well. The changeover was pretty painless too, just a few days of learning where things had moved (e.g. runaround is called text wrap).

    There is alot of discussion around on the internet about Quark vs InDesign, so google it and see what others say too.

    I am a convert!
    Insert witty comment here.

    See, you can trust me.

  5. #5

    Default

    Have a look with google, theres alot of info about this topic

    I've gone from Quark to InDesign, InDesign makes things so easy,

    Being able to import .psd files is great
    Story editor
    Seperations preview etc etc

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    508

    Default

    Too bad InDesign isn't backwards compatible with itself. (ie CS can't open files from version 2.0 and below). What is the go with that!?
    Rev.B 20" Intel iMac: 2.16GHZ, 2GB RAM, 256MB VIDEO, 500GB HDD
    Be aware, be peaceful.

  7. #7

    Default

    Originally posted by snax@Jan 19 2005, 07:36 PM
    Too bad InDesign isn't backwards compatible with itself. (ie CS can't open files from version 2.0 and below).
    Sure it can. ID2 can't open a CS file but that's to be expected with progress.

    We moved our entire production over to InDesign when ID2 came out. Moved to CS when it came out - changeover was smooth as silk.

    We'd been with Quark for about 10 years but the switch has been one of the best things we've done. Couldn't be happier to have left Quark behind.

    cheers

    kim

  8. #8

    Default

    Originally posted by snax@Jan 19 2005, 07:36 PM
    Too bad InDesign isn't backwards compatible with itself. (ie CS can't open files from version 2.0 and below). What is the go with that!?
    it can.... i haven't figured out a way to save to an earlier version thou... apparently it can be done :huh:

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    63

    Default

    From a PrePress standpoint, InDesign is great as long as you don't go too crazy with transparency effects.

    Spot colour seps in general are a real breeze with ID as the Ink Manager solves almost all of the issues, the only problems really happen when spot colours interact with transparency. Just make sure that your read the chapter in the manual on transparency and flattening!

    Overprint Preview and Separation Preview are fantastic tools. The print engine is very powerful too, with full support for inRIP separations.

    Legacy support in all CS applications is a little bit crap! You can't save back to previous versions for compatability with others if needed.

    Quark 6 is an absolute dog - nuff said. It is buggy, and VERY slow! Needless to say you can't really do anything in Quark 6 that is mentioned above! Printing is reliable as always.

    The learning curve is a little steep to start with, but after a while you find that Quark is really quite limited (not to mention overpriced).

    Baxter
    Baxter

    Smile! People will wonder what you are up to

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    508

    Default

    Originally posted by neilrobinson@Jan 19 2005, 08:49 PM
    it can.... i haven't figured out a way to save to an earlier version thou... apparently it can be done :huh:
    My mistake Neil.... You're right, that's the problem: In CS you can't save down to .id2, which as you can imagine left us screwed when the printer in Japan only had version 2.0

    More here http://www.graphicpush.com/archives/000011.shtml
    Rev.B 20" Intel iMac: 2.16GHZ, 2GB RAM, 256MB VIDEO, 500GB HDD
    Be aware, be peaceful.

  11. #11

    Default

    Have any InDesign users had problems with printers who are still only using Quark? I had heard of problems initially, but have you found they're switching over too?

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    63

    Default

    Most PrePress Bureaus/Printers should have IDCS by now, if they don't go somewhere else. There is no excuse to be that far behind! (Just don't expect them to have ID4 the day after it comes out - most places like to wait and see what the demand is like first)
    Baxter

    Smile! People will wonder what you are up to

  13. #13

    Default

    Switch.


    I'm still a Quark user, but I think I'm going to switch this year.


  14. #14

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Man, this was real simple for me... When I moved to OS X full-time, my classic apps sucked , so Quark was out on it's ear :P . Started with ID 2, which was a little rough, but still a decent competitor for Quark 4/5.

    But in my opinion, InDesign CS DESTROYS Quark, when it comes to being a reliable layout tool.

    Man, I freaking fell in love when I saw the quality of the hi-res previews over Quark 6's fairly ordinary attempt at same. Then, what really sealed the deal was the Ink Manager & Separations preview.

    My advice (obviously only truly valid for me) - DROP QUARK LIKE A REALLY HOT STONE! Best of luck...
    Ready to eat, or what?

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    18

    Default

    InDesign all the way.. I've used Quark for years, way back since 4.11, and whilst it was the standard, I always had to fight it. InDesign just works... I think its awesome, and upgrade version transitions are extremely easy...

    Integration with PhotoChop and Illustrator is excellent!!

    Go InDesign - you won't look bag...

    Cheers,
    Nathan.

  16. #16

    Default

    In design is by far more advanced than Quark, however it isn't without it's problems.

    The most important thing before switching: Make sure your printer has the lastest rips to handle files created through Indesign.

    Other than that, if you do change you wont look back.

  17. #17

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    113

    Default

    I have no problems using Quark. I'm use to it and I can do design quicker than in Indesign.

    I use Indesign often, but when I have the time to spend learning the program.

    I can understand people using Indesign, the price difference being the main factor.

  18. #18
    chucky Guest

    Default

    Quark have always treated their (once loyal) customer base with utter contempt. Fred Ebrahimi (Quark's CEO) was famously quoted as saying "All [our] customers are liars, thieves and bastards". Regardless of InDesign's superiority as a layout program, that alone should be enough to convince you to switch.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •