Welcome to MacTalk Australia

the largest Australian community for Apple discussions and topics

Join the discussions, Register Now!
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,648

    Default Is FileMaker still suitable for these smaller databases?

    For my bookstore I need to keep track of individual books, the publisher and the distributor. In the past I would likely have used Bento and it seems that FileMaker may be overkill. Is FileMaker still suitable for these smaller databases?
    An Aussie Online Sports Book store http://www.lockerroombooks.com.au

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SRG View Post
    For my bookstore I need to keep track of individual books, the publisher and the distributor. In the past I would likely have used Bento and it seems that FileMaker may be overkill. Is FileMaker still suitable for these smaller databases?

    Hi SRG,

    From a technical perspective, I would say FileMaker is not overkill for smaller databases. I have plenty of FM databases with just one or two tables and maybe just a few hundred records.

    From a price point of view, that depends. FM costs significantly more than what Bento did, so you'd need to crunch the numbers. Of course the benefit of FM is it can *do* significantly more than what Bento can, and you would have the flexibility of expanding and enriching your book database, and maybe creating others. Container fields, for instance, especially in the latest version of FM, lend themselves nicely to cataloging.

    Cheers,
    Brad

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    771

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BradTaylor View Post
    From a technical perspective, I would say FileMaker is not overkill for smaller databases. I have plenty of FM databases with just one or two tables and maybe just a few hundred records.

    From a price point of view, that depends. FM costs significantly more than what Bento did, so you'd need to crunch the numbers.
    And therein lies the problem. What application cost-effectively services the smaller (and non-commercial) database market?

    And while I'm here, does FM have a Table View similar to what Bento 4 for iPad did?

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kerr View Post
    And therein lies the problem. What application cost-effectively services the smaller (and non-commercial) database market?

    And while I'm here, does FM have a Table View similar to what Bento 4 for iPad did?
    Hi Kerr: yes, FM does have table view, in both FM Pro and FM Go. Attached is a screenshot from an iPhone 5 of table view in FM Go.

    Not sure I know enough about cheaper alternatives to FM to be able to recommend any, I'm afraid.

    Attachment 3262
    Last edited by MacTalk; 29th August 2014 at 09:17 AM.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    771

    Default

    Thanks. Did you forget the screenshot?

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Hi Kerr,

    We had a few issues with the uploader. I have added the image now.

    Regards,
    Jonathan

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    771

    Default

    Invalid Attachment specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •